Ethics

Most ethical core studies

 

Least ethical core studies

·        Zimbardo – Protection of participants, Withdrawal difficult, lack of informed consent, confidentiality – arrest at home, torture, observation, wearing dress

·        Milgram – Protection of participants, withdrawal, Deception, upsetting

·        Bandura – Teaching aggression, frightening child (Protection of participant). Consent, withdrawal

·        Gardner and Gardner – animal rights

·        Rosenhan – protection of participants – taking drugs

·        Piliavin – deception, upsetting people, protection of participants

 

Problems with trying to be ethical

 

·        You need to deceive in order for the experiment to work (Demand Characteristics would ruin the experiment) e.g Milgram – if they knew it was to do with obedience the participants would not have obeyed.

·        Impracticable to debrief and get consent (e.g. Piliavin)

·        Difficult to get fully informed consent without giving away what the experiment is all about, so demand characteristics ruin the experiment.

·        It is not always possible to predict how people will react (e.g. Zimbardo – who was to know the prisoners would break down?

Milgram – he didn’t expect people to obey.

·        Could miss out on interesting research, for example, into anti-social behaviour.  Bandura’s aggression experiment could have been much worse.

·        Research that adheres fully to ethical guidelines would suffer from low ecological validity.

 

Bear in mind that the results of ethical studies could be used un-ethically – links with social control.  E.g. Raine, Gould, Hodges and Tizard.

 

Think about how to make unethical studies ethical.

 

 

Ethical suggestions for research that has been unethical

 

Zimbardo – experimenter should not get involved – should have an independent person watching what goes on with prisoners.

 

Zimbardo – observe real guards and interview families.

 

Make it a natural experiment and you should not go wrong!