Sources within the person
Illness itself can produce stress. The
ability of the body to fight disease normally improves in childhood and declines
in old age (Rogers et al, 1979). Children have a limited understanding of
disease and death. When ill, children tend to focus on the current rather than
future concerns (La Greca & Stone, 1985). Patients worry about being
disabled or possibly dying from their illness.
Another source of stress is when conflict
exists. The conflicts do not have to concern the choice between two negative
outcomes. Making a choice between which of two houses to buy can produce
stress.
Approach/approach conflict
This is the conflict produced when the choice
is between two good strategies. For example needing to follow a diet and
wanting to eat a fattening cake. These conflicts are easily resolved but the
more important the decision seems to be, the more difficult it is for the
person to solve the conflict.
Avoidance/Avoidance conflict
This is the conflict produced when the choice
is between two bad strategies. For example, the choice between two equally
harrowing treatments for an illness. Patients often delay making a choice and
might easily change their minds repeatedly. Patients might even change their
doctor in the hope that they will be given an easier choice. They might even
get somebody else to make the decision for them. This conflict is difficult to
resolve and very stressful.
Approach/Avoidance conflict
This is when a single goal has good points
and bad points. For example giving up smoking might mean a gain in weight.
Sources in the family
Interpersonal conflict can arise from
financial problems, from inconsiderate behaviour, and from opposing goals.
Overcrowded conditions increases conflict over privacy and the use of family
resources, such as the Bathroom. Major sources of stress in the family are the
addition of a new family member, illness, infirmity, and death in the family.
An addition to the family
Obviously the mother will experience much
stress during pregnancy and after the birth. But the father may also worry over
money, or his wife's and baby's health, or fear that his relationship with his
wife may deteriorate.
Parents may experience stress from their
relationship with the baby. Each baby comes into the world with certain
personality dispositions, which are called temperaments (Buss & Plomin,
1975). There are easy babies and difficult ones. Babies react differently to
feeding, cuddling, bathing, and dressing.
Difficult babies tend to cry a great deal.
They resist new foods, routines, and people, and their patterns of Sleep,
hunger, and bowel movements are hard to predict. About 10% of babies are
classified as difficult displaying most of these traits fairly consistently,
many others show some of these traits occasionally. Longitudinal studies have
shown that children's temperaments are stable across time. Many traits continue
for many years, although many difficult children show changes toward the
development of easy traits (Carey & McDevitt, 1978).
The arrival of a new baby can also be
stressful to other children in the family (Honig, 1987). Much stress can be
experienced in children aged two or three years old who do not want to share
their parents with the new brother or sister. These children often show
increased clinging to the mother and their sleeping and toileting problems also
increase. Older children experience stress from the changes in the pattern of
family interaction, such as when the parents introduce new rules.
Family illness, disability, and death
A working mother with a sick child will
experience much stress. When children have a serious chronic illness, their
families have to cope with stress over a long period. The amount of time needed
to care for the child conflicts with other activities. The family also needs to
make difficult decisions. They need to learn about the illness and how to care
for their child. There is much expense and other children begin to feel left
out.
Adult sickness can also produce much stress
in the family. If a principal breadwinner is ill there will be a strain on the
family's financial resources. The family's time and personal freedom are
curtailed producing changes in interpersonal relationships.
If an elderly person who is ill or disabled
must live with and be careful by relatives, the stress for those in the
household can be severe, especially if the person requires constant care and
shows mental deterioration (Robinson & Thurner, 1986).
If a parent dies children under about five
years of age seem to grieve for the lost parent less strongly and for a shorter
time than older children and adolescents do (Garmezy, 1983). Children's concept
of death changes between four and eight years of age (Lonetto, 1980). Young
children think death is reversible: the person will come back eventually.
An adult whose child or spouse dies suffers a
tremendous loss. Bereaved mothers reported that they had lost important hopes
and expectations for the future (Edelstein, 1984). A mother who loses her only
child loses her identity and role as a mother too. The loss of a spouse is
especially stressful in early adult (Ball, 1976-77).
Child abuse
The stress caused by long-lasting psychological effects of sexual abuse in childhood has been found to increase the likelihood of certain diseases in old age. Women who were assaulted in their teens appeared to run greater risk of developing arthritis and breast cancer in later life, while Male victims are more likely to develop diseases of the thyroid than men who were not abused as children. 1,300 elderly middle-class participants were studied 12% of the women and 5% of the men reported unwanted sexual contact for childhood. Breast cancer and arthritis were relatively common amongst participants who had suffered sexual abuse; the more sustained the abuse the higher the risk of developing the diseases. However those abused were less likely to suffer from hypertension, but this was probably due to survivor bias, in other words, people with hypertension tend to die younger, so do not feature in studies of elderly people. Stein and Barrett-Connor (2000).
Sources in the community and society
Children experience stress at school and in competitive
events, such as in sports and band performances (Passer, 1982).
Jobs and stress
The TUC identifies four main causes:
Loss of self-esteem and a lack of control are two very common themes.
Demands of the task
Excessive workloads are associated with
increased rates of accidents and health problems (Mackay & Cox, 1978). The
workload for mothers is particularly heavy because not only do they work
outside of the home but also do most of the chores at home (Frankenhaeuser,
1991). Repetitive jobs that under utilise the workers abilities can produce
stress. The evaluation of an employee's job or performance is also particularly
stressful for both the supervisor and the employee (Quick and Quick, 1984).
Responsibility for people's lives
People working in the health professions need
to take many life and death decisions instantly and experience appalling
things, this leads to feelings of emotional exhaustion (Maslach & Jackson,
1982). The same applies to the police and fire fighters.
Stress can result from other aspects of jobs:
Retirement can be stressful because retired
people have lost opportunities for social interaction and an important part of
their identity. They may miss the power and influence they once hand, the
structure and routines of a job, and the feeling of being useful and competent
(Bohm & Rodin, 1985). In addition retired people often live on low incomes,
which again produces stress.
A study carried out by
Langer and Rodin (1976) attempted to discover the effects of giving people a
greater sense of personal control. They compared two different wards in a
nursing home for elderly people in Connecticut, USA. The residents in the two
wards were of similar age, health and socioeconomic status, and they had been
resident in the home for the same period of time on average (residents who
were too uncommunicative or bedridden to take part were excluded from the
study).
Both groups of residents
were given a talk, but the issue of personal responsibility was strongly
stressed with one of them and not the other. Furthermore, residents in this first
group were offered a plant each for their rooms and were asked where they
wanted it placed.
Additionally, they were allowed to choose which night to go and watch a film.
Residents in the other group were simply given the
plant and told
which night to go and see the film.
Even this fairly minimal
manipulation of personal control seemed to have a dramatic effect. Residents
who were given a greater sense of personal control were happier, more active,
more alert and, when the researchers returned after eighteen months, were in
better health and fewer had died. This study implies that having a greater
sense of personal control actually helps to reduce stress.
Commentary
• There are methodological and ethical criticisms
that can be made of Langer and Rodin’s study. The sample was very limited
(elderly Americans living in a particular care home). On the other hand, Langer
and Rodin took care to avoid demand characteristics by not informing the
residents, nurses or research assistants (who collected the data) of the
purpose of the study. Controlled
experiments on the damaging effects of stress in human beings can be very
unethical. In this case, Langer and Rodin would argue that they did not harm
anyone’s health, but actually improved it for those residents who were given a greater sense of control. On the
other hand, when the experiment was over, we do not know whether the situation
reverted to what it had been before, and it may be that being given a sense of control for three weeks, then having it removed again, did more harm than
good in the long term.
• There are clear implications of this study
for the way people are treated in residential homes. There is also a lesson to
be learnt when developing therapy to help people suffering from extreme stress.
If it is true that a low sense of personal control (that is, having a very
external locus of control) can lead to stress, then in cases where this applies
it may be beneficial for
therapy to focus on shifting people’s locus of control from external to
internal.
Environmental stress
Crowded conditions can be stressful for three
reasons:
People exposed to hazardous substances in
their environment worry for years about what will happen to them (Baum, 1988).
People who lived near the three mile Island
power plant in Pennsylvania, where a nuclear accident had happened suffered
more stress more than a year after the accident than other residents near a
similar facility (Fleming et al., 1982).
Adapted from Health Psychology, Edward Sarafino, Wiley, 1994, pages
84-91.
Stressors - produce stress
Source of stressors can be Family (as when trying to cope with a newborn baby
or when looking after a sick relative), Work or the Environment.
Stress response - response to stresssor
Stressors - external - e.g. heat, crowding, noise, difficulties with a loved one or contact with a hated one.
internal - e.g. pain, thoughts, feelings.
But not straightforward - heat can be relaxing and crowds can be exciting.
Individual differences.
-
Lundberg (1976)
Using urine samples
Commuters on crowded trains more stressed than in empty trains
but those that had been on the train since the start, showed less stress, even though they had been exposed to the crowded condition longer.
Being able to choose seat, control the situation, reduced the stress.
Hodgkinson and Stewart (1991)
PTSD -described in DSM-III (1980)
Most of the children reported intrusive thoughts and some experienced full-blown flashbacks.
Detached from others
Avoided not only ferry travel, but also the sea.
Immediate aftermath - avoided shower or bath.
Cyclical - reappear and disappear.
Onset can be several months later.
Just as severe.
Therapy or counselling - not that useful.
These people who found the counselling as 'unhelpful', fared no worse than people who reported that it was 'helpful'.
The diagram below shows the relationship between stress and arousal as
determined by a factor analytic technique (Mackay et al 1978)
Due to individual differences, pinpointing specific workplace activities that are likely to cause stress, does not go beyond the obvious. What may be seen as a challenge by one individual may be an impossible task or boring and repetitious to another.
Our background, motivation, experience, skills and knowledge on the one hand and the support and encouragement from managers, supervisors and colleagues on the other, all play an important role.
While it may be beyond the employer's responsibility, it is necessary to take into consideration the fact that not everyone comes to work with a cheerful disposition to start with. A death or sickness in the family, a temporary setback or other personal problems will influence the way in which we cope with the pressures of work. Good employers are aware of this and encourage their employees to address the problems that persist and work through them.
Levels of stress that become harmful are likely to occur when there is:
Those not in supervisory or management positions may have a heightened sense of these situations.
They can be started or made worse by:
Some occupations are, by their nature, stressful. They include those dealing with violent and aggressive behaviour or the threat of it occurring, or dealing with injury, disease and death, and having continuous contact with people and human suffering.
Workplace physical conditions can themselves create stress. Excessive noise with no control over sound levels can cause severe physical and behavioural problems. Severe vibration can have similar effects. Hot, humid conditions and the constant presence of hazardous substances or other hazards will also create stress.
Soccer shoot-out stress increases heart attack rate
Times 20-12-02
(abridged)
The study, published in today’s British Medical Journal,
investigated England’s 4-3 defeat on penalties by Argentina in the 1998 World
Cup. The researchers found that on the day of the match hospital admissions for
heart attacks increased by 25 per cent compared with the average. The day after
the match, admissions were up by 21 per cent; it was only three days later that
there was a significant fall.
The shoot-out had no effect on road traffic injuries or statistics
for deliberate self-harm, despite England’s demise, and no death in England has
been attributed to the shoot-out.
The study, by Birmingham and Bristol Universities, backs up
previous studies showing that moments of acute stress can bring on heart attacks.
Research in Israel found that the number of heart attacks doubled during Iraq’s
missile attack on Tel Aviv in 1991. A study during the week after the 1994
earthquake in southern California found a 35 per cent increase in hospital
admissions for heart attacks compared with the week before.
The researchers examined data on patients aged between 15 and 64
attending English hospitals on June 30, 1998, who had had a heart attack. They
then compared the figures with numbers admitted on the same date the previous
year and in subsequent years. They accounted for common environmental factors
such as temperature at the time and the day of the week on which the 30th fell
and used a mathematical model to assess the risks.
The expected number of admissions for heart attacks should have
been about 72, but on the day of the Argentina match there were 91. The day
after the match, when there should have been 71 admissions, there were 88.
Shah Ebrahim, of Bristol University, one of the authors of the
report, said that it appeared the stress of the situation was responsible for
the increased risk. “We were only looking at people aged between 15 and 64 for
whom to have a heart attack would be considered premature,” Professor Ebrahim
said.
Notes
from Canberra University
Stress Theories
Acknowledgement
Harari. P. and Legge. K., 2001, Psychology and Health, Heinemann, 0-435-80659-9, Highly recommended text for the whole class.